Listen to the programme on the NPR website
Fill in the blank spaces with a word or short phrase.
Post Mortem, the ongoing NPR Frontline
Pro Publica Investigation series, has exposed how death investigations in
America are nothing like what you see on TV.
Many prosecutors complain that shows
like "CSI" actually make their job harder. Jurors now demand (1) _____________________ to convict
suspects. But Frontline's Arun Rath reports that the media and the courts may
be overstating the CSI Effect.
Rath states that the fictional
forensic investigators in shows like "CSI" put (2)_________________ like Sherlock Holmes to shame.
P. Michael Murphy thinks that
"CSI" has done some great things for medical-legal (3) ______________________.
P. Michael Murphy is (4)______________________ for Clark
County, Nevada. His office was the model for the original "CSI" show.
Murphy states that the programme has caused
some problems. Some people expect his office to solve crime in 60 minutes (5) ________________________.
Anthony Zuiker, who created the
"CSI" franchise,states that Americans know that in one hour of
television the timesheets have to (6)_______________________ a bit.
Rath states that a lot of prosecutors
have complained that shows like CSI have created the expectation that all court
procedures must involve (7) ____________________________
.
Judge Donald Shelton, the chief judge
of Washtenaw County in Michigan, began to notice that reports about the CSI
effect were (8) _____________________________,
and short on data.
Judge Donald Shelton states that what surprised him when he began studying the CSI Effect was that there was no (9)_________________________.
Shelton and his team decided to
survey individuals who had been called to
(10) ______________
______________________ before they were actually selected.
In this survey, more than 2000
potential jurors revealed their expectations for scientific evidence in a
variety of (11)__________________________
in criminal trials.
Judge Shelton's study showed that the
technology people used in their everyday life had a (12)________________________ on how jurors evaluate scientific
evidence.
According to Rath, the belief persists
that shows like CSI make it harder to (13)_________________.
John Grossman is undersecretary of
forensic science and technology for Massachusetts. He worries the CSI Effect
raises the bar for (14)_________________________
who testify in court.
.
According to Rath, some states now
allow lawyers (15)___________________________
because of their television viewing habits.
According to Rath, all of this is
happening at a time when death
investigators in America have no resources to spare. Some states have already
opted not to do autopsies on (16)________________. Others don't
autopsy people who die in traffic accidents. And many don't autopsy people who
die over the age of 60.
KEY
1 ultra high-tech tests
2 old-time sleuths
old-time typical of the past. E.g. old-time dancing.
sleuth /sluːθ/ a person who investigates crimes. Detective. E.g. an amateur sleuth. Agatha Christie's super sleuth, Hercule Poirot.
3 death investigations
4 the coroner
coroner /ˈkɒrənə(r)/ an official whose job is to discover the cause of any sudden, violent or suspicious death by holding an inquest.
inquest /ˈɪŋkwest/ an official investigation to find out the cause of somebody's death, especially when it has not happened naturally. E.g. An inquest was held to discover the cause of death.
inquest /ˈɪŋkwest/ an official investigation to find out the cause of somebody's death, especially when it has not happened naturally. E.g. An inquest was held to discover the cause of death.
5 with three
commercials
6 be fudged a bit
fudge (on) something (rather informal) to avoid giving clear and accurate information, or a clear answer. E.g. I asked how long he was staying, but he fudged the answer. Politicians are often very clever at fudging the issue.
time sheet: a piece of paper on which the number of hours that somebody has worked are recorded
time sheet: a piece of paper on which the number of hours that somebody has worked are recorded
7 high-tech
forensic tests
8
long on anecdote
9 empirical research
10 jury service
jury service (also jury duty) a period of time spent as a member of a jury in court
jury service (also jury duty) a period of time spent as a member of a jury in court
11 scenarios
12 much bigger impact
13 get convictions
14 forensic
pathologists
15 to strike potential jurors
strike: Cancel, remove, or cross out with or as if with a pen. Put a line through. Sp. Tachar. E.g. I will strike his name from the list. The Court of Appeal struck out the claim for exemplary damages. She was striking words through with a pen.
strike: Cancel, remove, or cross out with or as if with a pen. Put a line through. Sp. Tachar. E.g. I will strike his name from the list. The Court of Appeal struck out the claim for exemplary damages. She was striking words through with a pen.
juror /ˈdʒʊərə(r)/ a member of a jury
16 suicides
Transcript
This is WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News. I'm
Liane Hansen.
Post Mortem, the ongoing NPR Frontline Pro
Publica Investigation series, has exposed how death investigations in America
are nothing like what you see on TV. Many prosecutors complain that shows like
"CSI" actually make their job harder. Jurors now demand ultra
high-tech tests to convict suspects. But Frontline's Arun Rath reports that the
media and the courts may be overstating the CSI Effect.
ARUN RATH: The fictional forensic
investigators in shows like "CSI" put old-time sleuths like Sherlock
Holmes to shame. They can read a crime scene like it's a glossy magazine.
(Soundbite of TV show, "CSI: New
York")
Unidentified Man (Actor): (as character)
Now, if Westwick's form was cut first, we'd had gravitational blood drops like
this all over the crime scene, but there is none, which means Alex was stabbed
in the back first before Westwick's arm was slashed.
Mr. P. MICHAEL MURPHY (Coroner, Clark
County, Nevada): I think that "CSI" has done some great things for
medical-legal death investigations. It has brought what we do from the shadows,
where people really didn't want to know and didn't care what we do, to the
bright light of day.
RATH: P. Michael Murphy is the coroner for
Clark County, Nevada. His office was the model for the original "CSI"
show.
Mr. MURPHY: It's also caused some problems.
And some of those problems are people expect us to have DNA back in 20 minutes
or that we're supposed to solve crime in 60 minutes with three commercials. It
doesn't happen that way.
Mr. ANTHONY ZUIKER (Creator,
"CSI"): Our job really is to make great television, first and
foremost. And so, we have to, quote, "sex it up."
RATH: Anthony Zuiker created the
"CSI" franchise.
Mr. ZUIKER: I think Americans know that DNA
doesn't come back in 20 minutes. I think Americans know that there's not some
magical computer that you press and the guy's face pops up and where he lives.
I think America knows that the timesheets when you're doing one hour of
television have to be fudged a bit. Americans know that. They're smart.
RATH: But a lot of legal experts are
concerned that juries may well be confusing fact with fiction. It's called The
CSI Effect. Prosecutors have been complaining that shows like "CSI"
create the expectation that every trial must feature high-tech forensic tests.
They worry that when they don't show off "CSI"-style technology,
juries might let criminals get away with murder.
Judge Donald Shelton, the chief judge of
Washtenaw County in Michigan, was skeptical. He began to notice that reports
about the CSI effect were long on anecdote, and short on data.
Judge DONALD SHELTON (Chief Judge,
Washtenaw County, Michigan): One of the things that surprised me when I started
doing research into the CSI Effect was that there was no empirical research.
That even the so-called studies that were out there were simply surveys of
lawyers' opinions.
RATH: So, Judge Shelton and his colleagues
came up with their own study.
Mr. SHELTON: What we decided to do was
survey people who'd been called for jury service before they were actually
selected.
RATH: More than 2,000 jurors divulged
details of their TV-watching habits and how they got their information about
the criminal justice system. Then they revealed their expectations for
scientific evidence in a variety of scenarios in criminal trials.
Mr. SHELTON: The final thing we did was to
compare what television programs they watched with their demands for scientific
evidence. What we found did not support that prosecutor's version.
RATH: Juries do expect to see scientific
evidence in murder cases, but their expectations have nothing to do with the TV
shows they watch.
Mr. SHELTON: Blaming CSI or any type of
television show is just too simplistic. It's much bigger than that.
RATH: People don't need to watch CSI to be
aware of advances in technology. They're more likely to be affected by the
technology in their own pocket. Judge Shelton's study showed that owning the
latest BlackBerry has a much bigger impact on how jurors evaluate scientific
evidence.
Mr. SHELTON: The more sophisticated
technological devices that jurors had, the higher their expectations for the
prosecution to present scientific evidence in criminal cases.
RATH: Despite the lack of empirical
evidence, the belief persists that shows like "CSI" make it harder to
get convictions.
John Grossman is undersecretary of forensic
science and technology for Massachusetts. He worries the CSI Effect raises the
bar for forensic pathologists who testify in court.
Mr. JOHN GROSSMAN (Undersecretary of
Forensic Science and Technology, Massachusetts): I think it makes it much
harder for the experts. Juries now expect high-level science to be done on lots
of cases where again we don't have the resources to do them and in many cases,
the science doesn't exist to do them.
RATH: Whatever the substance of the
connection, lawyers, judges, and death investigators are acting as if the CSI
Effect is real.
Some states now allow lawyers to strike
potential jurors based on their TV habits. Judges are issuing instructions that
warn juries about expecting too much scientific evidence based on what they see
on TV.
Judge Shelton says death investigators
sometimes run useless tests, just to show they went the extra CSI mile.
Mr. SHELTON: They will perform scientific
tests and present the evidence of that to the jury even if the results don't
show guilt or innocence either way, just to show the jury that they did it.
RATH: This is coming at a time when death
investigators in America have no resources to spare. Our investigation shows
some states have already opted not to do autopsies on suicides. Others don't
autopsy people who die in traffic accidents. And many don't autopsy people who
die over the age of 60.
Coroner Mike Murphy expects things to get
worse.
Mr. MURPHY: You know, we're in budget cuts
right now. Everybody's in budget cuts. Las Vegas is no different than anybody
else. We're hurting. We're going to feel that same crunch as everybody else.
RATH: A committee assembled by the National
Academy of Sciences looked at what it would cost to bring America up to speed.
It included Dr. Vincent Di Maio, who's been a medical examiner for over 40
years.
Dr. VINCENT DI MAIO (Medical Examiner): And
it's going to cost you. It's going to cost you about $2.25 to $2.50 a person in
your community per year, which is probably less than what you pay for a
Coca-Cola in a movie theater.
RATH: Whether legislators around the
country have the political will to make it happen is an entirely different
matter.
For NPR News, I'm Arun Rath.
HANSEN: You can get a better understanding
of death investigations by going to our Web site, NPR.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.